> -----Original Message----- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 11:31 PM > To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777 > Cc: Alexander Graf; qemu-ppc@xxxxxxxxxx List; kvm-ppc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; qemu- > devel qemu-devel; KVM list > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Enable kvm emulated watchdog > > On 08/01/2012 12:27 PM, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Alexander Graf [mailto:agraf@xxxxxxx] > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 7:57 AM > >> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777 > >> Cc: qemu-ppc@xxxxxxxxxx List; kvm-ppc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Bhushan > >> Bharat-R65777; qemu-devel qemu-devel; KVM list > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Enable kvm emulated watchdog > >> > >> > >> On 20.07.2012, at 07:23, Bharat Bhushan wrote: > >>> @@ -384,6 +437,15 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUPPCState *cenv) > >>> return ret; > >>> } > >>> > >>> + if (enable_watchdog_support) { > >>> + ret = kvm_watchdog_enable(cenv); > >> > >> Do you think this is a good idea? Why would real hardware not > >> implement a watchdog just because the user didn't select an action? > > > > If there is no watchdog action then why we want to run watchdog timer? > > On real hardware, if software sets WRC to a non-zero value, the watchdog action > is a system reset. The user doesn't have to do anything special. Scott, maybe I misunderstood you comment, did not you commented to enable kvm watchdog if there is watchdog action provided by use. Thanks -Bharat ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����o�^n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�
