Re: qemu-kvm-1.1.0 crashing with kernel 3.5.0-rc6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012-07-26 13:58, Chris Clayton wrote:
> On 07/26/12 11:01, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 07/26/2012 12:52 PM, Chris Clayton wrote:
>>> On 07/19/12 19:23, Chris Clayton wrote:
>>>> On 07/19/12 13:17, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>>> On 07/19/2012 03:14 PM, Chris Clayton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Change of diagnostics, unfortunately. qemu-kvm-1.0.1 can, in fact,
>>>>>>> crash
>>>>>>> on 3.5.0-rc6 (and rc7). I didn't get it earlier because it takes many
>>>>>>> times more invocations before the crash occurs with 1.0.1 and I
>>>>>>> haven't
>>>>>>> used qemu-kvm much in the past few weeks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm now checking whether I can get crashes (with 1.0.1 and/or
>>>>>>> 1.1.0) on
>>>>>>> linux-3.4.4. I'll report back in a day or two.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've started up qemu-kvm on kernel 3.4.4 many times and not see a
>>>>>> crash.
>>>>>> That would indicate that the problem is in the kernel. However, I
>>>>>> pulled
>>>>>> the latest and greatest from Linus yesterday evening and I now can't
>>>>>> get
>>>>>> the crash there either, so whatever it was seems to have been fixed. If
>>>>>> I checkout and build 3.5.0-rc[1..7], I can get the crash pretty
>>>>>> quickly,
>>>>>> so it's been fixed in the last few days.
>>>>>
>>>>> There were no kvm changes post-rc7.
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, I'm aware of that, Avi. This thread started because I was getting a
>>>> crash in qemu-kvm, which I thought was only in v1.1.0. Later it turned
>>>> out the the problem was also present in v1.0.1, but much harder to hit.
>>>> However, it only ever happened with 3.5.0 kernels. 3.4.4, with either
>>>> version of qemu-kvm, was stable. So then it seemed that the problem was
>>>> in the kernel, (but not necessarily in the kvm code).
>>>>
>>>> Something that's changed since rc7 has either fixed the problem or made
>>>> it much harder to hit. With rc7 and earlier I can recreate the crash
>>>> quite easily with qemu-kvm-1.1.0 and with enough runs of 1.0.1. With
>>>> rc7+, I haven't been able to get a crash at all.
>>>>
>>> Well, I'm getting the crash again, but this time I've managed to get a
>>> backtrace:
>>>
>>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>>> [Switching to Thread 0xb60ffb40 (LWP 9405)]
>>> 0xb7803d77 in __strcmp_sse4_2 () from /lib/libc.so.6
>>> (gdb) bt
>>> #0  0xb7803d77 in __strcmp_sse4_2 () from /lib/libc.so.6
>>> #1  0xb7e65333 in g_str_equal () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
>>> #2  0xb7e6458d in g_hash_table_lookup () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
>>> #3  0x8014e2cf in type_table_lookup (name=0x802b0c50 "apic-common") at
>>> qom/object.c:94
>>> #4  type_get_by_name (name=name@entry=0x802b0c50 "apic-common") at
>>> qom/object.c:149
>>> #5  0x8014e933 in object_dynamic_cast (obj=obj@entry=0x80a5d818,
>>> typename=typename@entry=0x802b0c50 "apic-common")
>>>      at qom/object.c:416
>>> #6  0x8014e8b9 in object_dynamic_cast_assert (obj=obj@entry=0x80a5d818,
>>>      typename=typename@entry=0x802b0c50 "apic-common") at qom/object.c:478
>>> #7  0x80193462 in cpu_set_apic_tpr (d=0x80a5d818, val=8 '\b')
>>>      at /home/chris/rpm/BUILD/qemu-kvm-1.1.1/hw/apic_common.c:60
>>> #8  0x801d0560 in kvm_arch_post_run (env=env@entry=0x80a55a60,
>>> run=run@entry=0xb6239000)
>>>      at /home/chris/rpm/BUILD/qemu-kvm-1.1.1/target-i386/kvm.c:1695
>>> #9  0x801cb05f in kvm_cpu_exec (env=env@entry=0x80a55a60) at
>>> /home/chris/rpm/BUILD/qemu-kvm-1.1.1/kvm-all.c:1269
>>> #10 0x80199d1e in qemu_kvm_cpu_thread_fn (arg=0x80a55a60) at
>>> /home/chris/rpm/BUILD/qemu-kvm-1.1.1/cpus.c:752
>>> #11 0xb7a1fd9e in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
>>> #12 0xb77bbbbe in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6
>>>
>>> This is with kernel 3.5.0 and qemu-kvm-1.1.1. glibc is 2.16.0 built
>>
>> It looks like general memory corruption.  Is this repeatable?  What's
>> the guest uptime when it happens (i.e. is it immediate?)
> 
> I've just done 10 runs of WinXP SP3 and 5 of them crashed. Three crashed 

Hmm, I'm running various XP SP3 here against qemu.git (now widely
equivalent to qemu-kvm), and I saw no crashes at all.

> early as XP was starting up - well before the desktop would have 
> appeared. The other two crashed as XP was closing down, having been 
> running for a few minutes (but not doing much).
> 
> The error messages seen through dmesg are:
> 
> qemu-kvm[12778] general protection ip:b6c43d77 sp:b5e800fc error:0 in 
> libc-2.16.so[b6b06000+1b4000]
> qemu-kvm[12813] general protection ip:b6bf6d77 sp:b54ff0fc error:0 in 
> libc-2.16.so[b6ab9000+1b4000]
> qemu-kvm[12986] general protection ip:b6cd3d77 sp:b55ff0fc error:0 in 
> libc-2.16.so[b6b96000+1b4000]
> qemu-kvm[13045] general protection ip:b6c91d77 sp:b54ff0fc error:0 in 
> libc-2.16.so[b6b54000+1b4000]
> qemu-kvm[13225] general protection ip:b6c5bd77 sp:b54ff0fc error:0 in 
> libc-2.16.so[b6b1e000+1b4000]

Oh, you are running 32-bit userland? Also 32-bit kernel? Most of us do
64-on-64.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux