Re: [PATCH] tcm_vhost: Expose ABI version via VHOST_SCSI_GET_ABI_VERSION

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 18:56 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 01:26:20AM +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > As requested by Anthony, here is a patch against target-pending/for-next-merge
> > to expose an ABI version to userspace via a new VHOST_SCSI_GET_ABI_VERSION
> > ioctl operation.
> > 
> > As mentioned in the comment, ABI Rev 0 is for pre 2012 out-of-tree code, and
> > ABI Rev 1 (the current rev) is for current WIP v3.6 kernel merge candiate code.
> > 
> > I think this is what you had in mind, and hopefully it will make MST happy too.
> > The incremental vhost-scsi patches against Zhi's QEMU are going out shortly ahead
> > of cutting a new vhost-scsi RFC over the next days.
> > 
> > Please have a look and let me know if you have any concerns here.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Reported-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c |    9 +++++++++
> >  drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.h |   11 +++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 

<SNIP>

> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.h
> > index e942df9..3d5378f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.h
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.h
> > @@ -80,7 +80,17 @@ struct tcm_vhost_tport {
> >  
> >  #include <linux/vhost.h>
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * Used by QEMU userspace to ensure a consistent vhost-scsi ABI.
> > + *
> > + * ABI Rev 0: All pre 2012 revisions used by prototype out-of-tree code
> > + * ABI Rev 1: 2012 version for v3.6 kernel merge candiate
> > + */
> > +
> > +#define VHOST_SCSI_ABI_VERSION	1
> > +
> >  struct vhost_scsi_target {
> > +	int abi_version;
> >  	unsigned char vhost_wwpn[TRANSPORT_IQN_LEN];
> >  	unsigned short vhost_tpgt;
> >  };
> > @@ -88,3 +98,4 @@ struct vhost_scsi_target {
> >  /* VHOST_SCSI specific defines */
> >  #define VHOST_SCSI_SET_ENDPOINT _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x40, struct vhost_scsi_target)
> >  #define VHOST_SCSI_CLEAR_ENDPOINT _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x41, struct vhost_scsi_target)
> > +#define VHOST_SCSI_GET_ABI_VERSION _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x42, struct vhost_scsi_target)
> 
> No, you just broke the ABI for version "0" here, that's not how you do
> this at all.
> 

The intention of this patch is use ABI=1 as a starting point for
tcm_vhost moving forward, with no back-wards compat for the ABI=0
prototype userspace code because:

- It's based on a slightly older version of QEMU (updating the QEMU series now)
- It does not have an GET_ABI_VERSION ioctl cmd (that starts with ABI=1)
- It has a small user-base of target + virtio-scsi developers

So I did consider just starting from ABI=0, but figured this would help
reduce the confusion for QEMU userspace wrt to the vhost-scsi code
that's been floating around out-of-tree for the last 2 years.

Stefan & Co folks, do you have a preference for a starting point..?

Thanks,

--nab

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux