On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:17:36AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 07/20/2012 07:58 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> >> - }
> >> + rc = ctxt->ops->read_emulated(ctxt, addr, mc->data + mc->end, size,
> >> + &ctxt->exception);
> >> + if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> >> + return rc;
> >> +
> >> + mc->end += size;
> >> +
> >> +read_cached:
> >> + memcpy(dest, mc->data + mc->pos, size);
> >
> > What prevents read_emulated(size > 8) call, with
> > mc->pos == (mc->end - 8) now?
>
> Marcelo,
>
> The splitting has been done in emulator_read_write_onepage:
>
> while (bytes) {
> unsigned now = min(bytes, 8U);
>
> frag = &vcpu->mmio_fragments[vcpu->mmio_nr_fragments++];
> frag->gpa = gpa;
> frag->data = val;
> frag->len = now;
> frag->write_readonly_mem = (ret == -EPERM);
>
> gpa += now;
> val += now;
> bytes -= now;
> }
>
> So i think it is safe to remove the splitting in read_emulated.
Yes, it is fine to remove it.
But splitting in emulate.c prevented the case of _cache read_ with size
> 8 beyond end of mc->data. Must handle that case in read_emulated.
"What prevents read_emulated(size > 8) call, with mc->pos == (mc->end - 8) now?"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
