BTW, they are some bug fix patches on -master branch, but it is not existed on -next branch: commit: f411930442e01f9cf1bf4df41ff7e89476575c4d commit: 85b7059169e128c57a3a8a3e588fb89cb2031da1 It causes code conflict if we do the development on -next. On 07/20/2012 08:39 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:can > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:53:29PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: >> If it have no indirect shadow pages we need not protect any gfn, >> this is always true for direct mmu without nested >> >> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Xiao, > > What is the motivation? Numbers please. > > In fact, what case was the original indirect_shadow_pages conditional in > kvm_mmu_pte_write optimizing again? > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
