Re: [RFC-v2 0/4] tcm_vhost+cmwq fabric driver code for-3.6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/18/2012 11:47 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 11:00 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:

Of course: Think about the consequences: you want to upgrade one array
on your SAN.  You definitely don't want to shut down your entire data
centre to achieve it.  In place upgrades on running SANs have been
common in enterprise environments for a while.

Would firmware upgrades ever result in major OS visible changes though?

Maybe OSes are more robust with SCSI than with other types of buses, but I don't think it's safe to completely ignore the problem.

I agree that in general, SCSI targets don't need this, but I'm pretty sure that
if a guest probes for a command, you migrate to an old version, and that command
is no longer there, badness will ensue.

What command are we talking about?  Operation of initiators is usually
just READ and WRITE.  So perhaps we might have inline UNMAP ... but the
world wouldn't come to an end even if the latter stopped working.

Is that true for all OSes? Linux may handle things gracefully if UNMAP starts throwing errors but that doesn't mean that Windows will.

There are other cases where this creates problems. Windows (and some other OSes) fingerprint the hardware profile in order to do license enforcement. If the hardware changes beyond a certain amount, then they refuse to boot.

Windows does this with a points system and I do believe that INQUIRY responses from any local disks are included in this tally.

Most of the complex SCSI stuff is done at start of day; it's actually
only then we'd notice things like changes in INQUIRY strings or mode
pages.

Failover, which is what you're talking about, requires reinstatement of
all the operating parameters of the source/target system, but that's not
wholly the responsibility of the storage system ...

It's the responsibility of the hypervisor when dealing with live migration.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori


James

It's different when you're talking about a reboot happening or a
disconnect/reconnect due to firmware upgrade.  The OS would naturally be
reprobing in this case.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux