On 13/07/12 05:35, Raghavendra K T wrote: > Yes! I forgot about archs in init function. > How about having > #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT > vcpu->ple.cpu_relax_intercepted = false; > vcpu->ple.dy_eligible = false; > #endif > > This would solve all the problem. No, you need to mask all places.... > >>> >>> r = kvm_arch_vcpu_init(vcpu); >>> if (r< 0) >>> @@ -1577,6 +1579,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me) >>> int pass; >>> int i; >>> >>> + me->ple.cpu_relax_intercepted = true; >> >> dito > > currently vcpu_on_spin is used only by x86 and s390. so if some other > arch in future uses vcpu_on_spin, I believe they also have to enable > CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT > what do you think? ...because this function is compiled no matter if called or not. > >> maybe define static inline access functions in kvm_host.h that are no-ops >> if CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT is not set. As I already said, can you have a look at using access functions? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
