Re: [PATCHv3 RFC 0/2] kvm: direct msix injection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012-07-09 00:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:08:20AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 11:32 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2012-06-11 13:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>> We can deliver certain interrupts, notably MSIX,
>>>> from atomic context.
>>>> Here's an untested patch to do this (compiled only).
>>>>
>>>> Changes from v2:
>>>> Don't inject broadcast interrupts directly
>>>> Changes from v1:
>>>> Tried to address comments from v1, except unifying
>>>> with kvm_set_irq: passing flags to it looks too ugly.
>>>> Added a comment.
>>>>
>>>> Jan, you said you can test this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Michael S. Tsirkin (2):
>>>>   kvm: implement kvm_set_msi_inatomic
>>>>   kvm: deliver msix interrupts from irq handler
>>>>
>>>>  include/linux/kvm_host.h |  3 ++
>>>>  virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c  | 31 ++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>  virt/kvm/irq_comm.c      | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>>>  3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Finally-tested-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Michael, we need either this or the simple oneshot patch to get device
>> assignment working again for 3.5.  Are you planning to push this for
>> 3.5?  Thanks,
>>
>> Alex
>>
> 
> Avi wants this reworked using an injection cache. I agree with Jan
> though: oneshot looks too ugly. Just so you can make progress, can't we
> add a stub handler returning IRQ_WAKE_THREAD unconditionally for now?
> I.e. like the below (warning: completely untested).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> --
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c b/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
> index b1e091a..18cc36e 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
> @@ -334,6 +334,11 @@ static int assigned_device_enable_host_intx(struct kvm *kvm,
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef __KVM_HAVE_MSI
> +static irqreturn_t kvm_assigned_dev_msi(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +       return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> +}
> +
>  static int assigned_device_enable_host_msi(struct kvm *kvm,
>  					   struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *dev)
>  {
> @@ -346,7 +351,7 @@ static int assigned_device_enable_host_msi(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	}
>  
>  	dev->host_irq = dev->dev->irq;
> -	if (request_threaded_irq(dev->host_irq, NULL,
> +	if (request_threaded_irq(dev->host_irq, kvm_assigned_dev_msi,
>  				 kvm_assigned_dev_thread_msi, 0,
>  				 dev->irq_name, dev)) {
>  		pci_disable_msi(dev->dev);
> @@ -358,6 +363,11 @@ static int assigned_device_enable_host_msi(struct kvm *kvm,
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef __KVM_HAVE_MSIX
> +static irqreturn_t kvm_assigned_dev_msix(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +       return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> +}
> +
>  static int assigned_device_enable_host_msix(struct kvm *kvm,
>  					    struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *dev)
>  {
> @@ -374,7 +384,8 @@ static int assigned_device_enable_host_msix(struct kvm *kvm,
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < dev->entries_nr; i++) {
>  		r = request_threaded_irq(dev->host_msix_entries[i].vector,
> -					 NULL, kvm_assigned_dev_thread_msix,
> +					 kvm_assigned_dev_msix,
> +					 kvm_assigned_dev_thread_msix,
>  					 0, dev->irq_name, dev);
>  		if (r)
>  			goto err;
> 

Should restore the status quo before 3.5's IRQ layer changes. Looks ok
to me.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux