> -----Original Message----- > From: Alexander Graf [mailto:agraf@xxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 3:13 PM > To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 > Cc: kvm-ppc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc- > dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; qemu-ppc@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR > support in sregs > > On 07/05/2012 01:49 PM, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Alexander Graf [mailto:agraf@xxxxxxx] > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 4:34 PM > >> To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 > >> Cc: kvm-ppc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc- > >> dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; qemu-ppc@xxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR > >> support in sregs > >> > >> > >> On 25.06.2012, at 14:26, Mihai Caraman wrote: > >> > >>> Add KVM_SREGS_E_64 feature and EPCR spr support in get/set sregs > >>> for 64-bit hosts. > >> Please also implement a ONE_REG interface while at it. Over time, I'd > >> like to move towards ONE_REG instead of the messy regs/sregs API. > > ONE_REG doesn't seem to be implemented at all for book3e, I looked at > > kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_one_reg/kvm_vcpu_ioctl_get_one_reg in booke.c file. > > > > I can take care of it soon but in a different patch set. It's ok like > this? > > Do it in a different patch, but as part of this patch set. Hmm ... then if you don't disagree I will do it as a prerequisite patch since I want to keep this patchset strictly for 64-bit support. I am not familiar with ONE_REG, is qemu tailored to use it? I need a way to test it. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
