Il 04/07/2012 14:50, Kevin Wolf ha scritto: > Before merging the patches (or actually this patch, I think patch 1 is > fairly independent), Yes, it is. > I'd like to hear more opinions on whether we need > the cache parameter split first Ok, let's discuss it next week on the KVM/QEMU call. Getting the cache parameter split before 1.2 is going to be hard, but who knows. > But as far as the hardware is > concerned, sure, take it as an Acked-by and go forward with the spec and > kernel side of things. Rusty already committed everything, so it's too late! :) (Sorry for the tabs vs. spaces BTW). Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html