At 06/28/2012 04:26 PM, Jan Kiszka Wrote:
> On 2012-06-28 03:15, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 06/27/2012 10:39 PM, Jan Kiszka Wrote:
>>> On 2012-06-27 09:02, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>>> When the guest is panicked, it will write 0x1 to the port KVM_PV_PORT.
>>>> So if qemu reads 0x1 from this port, we can do the folloing three
>>>> things according to the parameter -onpanic:
>>>> 1. emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED only
>>>> 2. emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED and pause the guest
>>>> 3. emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED and poweroff the guest
>>>> 4. emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED and reset the guest
>>>>
>>>> Note: if we emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED only, and the management
>>>> application does not receive this event(the management may not
>>>> run when the event is emitted), the management won't know the
>>>> guest is panicked.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> kvm-all.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> kvm-stub.c | 9 +++++
>>>> kvm.h | 3 ++
>>>> qemu-options.hx | 15 ++++++++
>>>> vl.c | 10 +++++
>>>> 5 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
>>>> index f8e4328..9494dd2 100644
>>>> --- a/kvm-all.c
>>>> +++ b/kvm-all.c
>>>> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
>>>> #include <stdarg.h>
>>>>
>>>> #include <linux/kvm.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/kvm_para.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/kvm_para.h>
>>>>
>>>> #include "qemu-common.h"
>>>> #include "qemu-barrier.h"
>>>> @@ -32,6 +34,9 @@
>>>> #include "bswap.h"
>>>> #include "memory.h"
>>>> #include "exec-memory.h"
>>>> +#include "iorange.h"
>>>> +#include "qemu-objects.h"
>>>> +#include "monitor.h"
>>>>
>>>> /* This check must be after config-host.h is included */
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_EVENTFD
>>>> @@ -1931,3 +1936,99 @@ int kvm_on_sigbus(int code, void *addr)
>>>> {
>>>> return kvm_arch_on_sigbus(code, addr);
>>>> }
>>>> +
>>>> +/* Possible values for action parameter. */
>>>> +#define PANICKED_REPORT 1 /* emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED only */
>>>> +#define PANICKED_PAUSE 2 /* emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED and pause VM */
>>>> +#define PANICKED_POWEROFF 3 /* emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED and quit VM */
>>>> +#define PANICKED_RESET 4 /* emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED and reset VM */
>>>> +
>>>> +static int panicked_action = PANICKED_REPORT;
>>>> +
>>>> +static void kvm_pv_port_read(IORange *iorange, uint64_t offset, unsigned width,
>>>> + uint64_t *data)
>>>> +{
>>>> + *data = (1 << KVM_PV_FEATURE_PANICKED);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void panicked_mon_event(const char *action)
>>>> +{
>>>> + QObject *data;
>>>> +
>>>> + data = qobject_from_jsonf("{ 'action': %s }", action);
>>>> + monitor_protocol_event(QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED, data);
>>>> + qobject_decref(data);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void panicked_perform_action(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> + switch (panicked_action) {
>>>> + case PANICKED_REPORT:
>>>> + panicked_mon_event("report");
>>>> + break;
>>>> +
>>>> + case PANICKED_PAUSE:
>>>> + panicked_mon_event("pause");
>>>> + vm_stop(RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED);
>>>> + break;
>>>> +
>>>> + case PANICKED_POWEROFF:
>>>> + panicked_mon_event("poweroff");
>>>> + exit(0);
>>>> + break;
>>>> + case PANICKED_RESET:
>>>> + panicked_mon_event("reset");
>>>> + qemu_system_reset_request();
>>>> + break;
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void kvm_pv_port_write(IORange *iorange, uint64_t offset, unsigned width,
>>>> + uint64_t data)
>>>> +{
>>>> + if (data == KVM_PV_PANICKED) {
>>>> + panicked_perform_action();
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void kvm_pv_port_destructor(IORange *iorange)
>>>> +{
>>>> + g_free(iorange);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static IORangeOps pv_io_range_ops = {
>>>> + .read = kvm_pv_port_read,
>>>> + .write = kvm_pv_port_write,
>>>> + .destructor = kvm_pv_port_destructor,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +#if defined(KVM_PV_PORT)
>>>> +void kvm_pv_port_init(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> + IORange *pv_io_range = g_malloc(sizeof(IORange));
>>>> +
>>>> + iorange_init(pv_io_range, &pv_io_range_ops, KVM_PV_PORT, 1);
>>>> + ioport_register(pv_io_range);
>>>
>>> This modeling is still not ok. We don't open-code ports anymore, we
>>> introduce devices. And this doesn't belong inro generic code as it is
>>
>> Do you mean introducing a new device instead of I/O port?
>
> I mean encapsulating the I/O registration (PIO or MMIO) in a QOM device
A QOM device? Do you mean introduce a new device? If so, the guest should
have a driver to know such device. Another problem is: we cannot use
such device when the kernel is starting(the device's driver is not ready).
If we use a new device, I think virtio-serial is enough. The reason why
I do not use virtio-serial is: I want the feature can also work when the
kernel is starting.
Thanks
Wen Congyang
> and building that device only for target archs that supports it. Already
> pointed you to examples in hw/kvm/.
>
> Jan
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
