On 07/02/2012 06:51 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 09:56 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: >> Before we start fiddling with what we can and can't add to KVM_IRQFD >> we need to figure out if anyone has been sloppy in their use of the >> ioctl flags. This series has a minor cleanup to pass the struct >> kvm_irqfd to seup functions rather than individual parameters, making >> it more consistent with ioeventfd, adds API documentation for this >> ioctl, and sanitizes the flags. If anyone screams, we may have to >> revert this last patch. Thanks, > > Avi, what do you think about trying to get this in for 3.5 to test > whether we break anyone? Then we can aim for 3.6 for level irqfd & > eoifd support. Makes sense. Marcelo? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html