On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:21:07 +0800
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Again, "rmap" does not break the logic, the spte we handle in this function must
> be in rmap.
I'm not saying whether this breaks some logic or not.
rmap_printk("rmap_write_protect: spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep);
helps developers by saying "rmap_write_protect() protected ...."
For another function, the message should be "another_func_name: spte ..."
But OK, I won't argue about this anymore.
We can change the debug message later if needed.
Thanks,
Takuya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
