Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/18/2012 06:58 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
As long as the latency is decreasing that's good.  But It's worth
keeping in mind that these percentages are probably wildly different
on real storage devices and/or qemu-kvm.  What we don't know here is
whether this bottleneck matters in real environments - results with
real storage and with qemu-kvm would be interesting.

Yes. Here is the performance data on a Fusion-IO SSD device.

Fio test is performed in a 8 vcpu guest with Fusion-IO based guest using kvm tool.

    Short version:
     With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write
     IOPS boost         : 11%, 11%, 13%, 10%
     Latency improvement: 10%, 10%, 12%, 10%

    Long Version:
     With bio-based IO path:
      read : io=2048.0MB, bw=58920KB/s, iops=117840 , runt= 35593msec
      write: io=2048.0MB, bw=64308KB/s, iops=128616 , runt= 32611msec
      read : io=3095.7MB, bw=59633KB/s, iops=119266 , runt= 53157msec
      write: io=3095.7MB, bw=62993KB/s, iops=125985 , runt= 50322msec
        clat (usec): min=0 , max=1284.3K, avg=128109.01, stdev=71513.29
        clat (usec): min=94 , max=962339 , avg=116832.95, stdev=65836.80
        clat (usec): min=0 , max=1846.6K, avg=128509.99, stdev=89575.07
        clat (usec): min=0 , max=2256.4K, avg=121361.84, stdev=82747.25
cpu : usr=56.79%, sys=421.70%, ctx=147335118, majf=21080, minf=19852517
cpu : usr=61.81%, sys=455.53%, ctx=143269950, majf=16027, minf=24800604
cpu : usr=63.10%, sys=455.38%, ctx=178373538, majf=16958, minf=24822612
cpu : usr=62.04%, sys=453.58%, ctx=226902362, majf=16089, minf=23278105

     With request-based IO path:
      read : io=2048.0MB, bw=52896KB/s, iops=105791 , runt= 39647msec
      write: io=2048.0MB, bw=57856KB/s, iops=115711 , runt= 36248msec
      read : io=3095.7MB, bw=52387KB/s, iops=104773 , runt= 60510msec
      write: io=3095.7MB, bw=57310KB/s, iops=114619 , runt= 55312msec
        clat (usec): min=0 , max=1532.6K, avg=142085.62, stdev=109196.84
        clat (usec): min=0 , max=1487.4K, avg=129110.71, stdev=114973.64
        clat (usec): min=0 , max=1388.6K, avg=145049.22, stdev=107232.55
        clat (usec): min=0 , max=1465.9K, avg=133585.67, stdev=110322.95
cpu : usr=44.08%, sys=590.71%, ctx=451812322, majf=14841, minf=17648641
cpu : usr=48.73%, sys=610.78%, ctx=418953997, majf=22164, minf=26850689
cpu : usr=45.58%, sys=581.16%, ctx=714079216, majf=21497, minf=22558223
cpu : usr=48.40%, sys=599.65%, ctx=656089423, majf=16393, minf=23824409


--
Asias


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux