Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-spec: flexible configuration layout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 14:54 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 02:36:43PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > >They don't exist in kernel code either, for same reason as above.
> > >
> > >Nothing will break if we remove it since no one really used it, we were
> > >probably the first and only implementation of the spec which considered
> > >them :)
> > 
> > As long as we are able to run older versions of the KVM tool with
> > newer kernels and vice versa, I see no reason why we can't drop
> > 64-bit features from the KVM tool.
> > 
> > 			Pekka
> 
> So what happened? Did you guys do this?  Need to know what to do to make
> progress.  IIUC Rusty removed the new fields in 0.9.3.
> Does your tool still use them? Did any version of the tool released by
> distros do so?

Yup, they were removed quite a while ago.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux