On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 21:25 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 20:06 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > > Sorry, no, first demonstrate no performance regressions, then we can > > talk about performance improvements. > > No performance regressions? For caching? How would that work? > > Or even if you meant just the kvm-tmem interface overhead, I don't see > how that would work. btw, so far we've been poking on half of the code here. What about frontswap over kvm-tmem? are there any specific tests you'd like to see there? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
