On 2012-06-08 10:47, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > Yet another try :) > > Normally the pci_add_capability is called on devices to add new > capability. This is ok for emulated devices which capabilities list > is being built by QEMU. > > In the case of VFIO the capability may already exist and adding new Why does it exit? VFIO should build the virtual capability list from scratch (just like classic device assignment does), recreating the layout of the physical device (except for masked out caps). In that case, this conflict should become impossible, no? But if pci_*add*_capability should actually be used like this (I doubt this), some renaming would be required. "Add" sound like "append" to me, not "update". Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
