On 06/06/2012 02:45 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 14:38 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 06/06/2012 02:32 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: >> > >> >> and benchmark results. >> > >> > Is there a specific test you'd like to see? My tests were based around >> > the "streaming test" you proposed last time this discussion came up, and >> > runs of 'fio' in guests. >> >> Those are fine, thanks. >> >> btw, IIUC, a guest can have two tmem providers: the hypervisor and >> zcache. How does it choose? > > The guest will try to use the hypervisor, unless: > > - 'nokvmcleancache' is passed as param - in that case cleancache will > use the local zcache provider. > > - 'nokvmfrontswap' is passed as param - in that case frontswap will use > the local zcache provider. The guest may have more memory than free host memory, and its memory is certainly faster; but I'm not sure how to integrate this better. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
