On 2012-05-31 19:44, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 05/31/2012 01:01 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote: > >> From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Thanks Alex for KVM_HC_FEATURES inputs and Jan for VAPIC_POLL_IRQ >> >> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..c79335a >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ >> +KVM Hypercalls Documentation >> +=========================== >> +The template for each hypercall is: >> +1. Hypercall name, value. >> +2. Architecture(s) >> +3. Status (deprecated, obsolete, active) >> +4. Purpose >> + >> +1. KVM_HC_VAPIC_POLL_IRQ >> +------------------------ >> +Value: 1 >> +Architecture: x86 > > > No "Status", does that imply "Active" ? It should actually state that this call is in use. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
