RE: which branch of kvm.git should I do regular testing against?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avi Kivity [mailto:avi@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 5:46 PM
> To: Ren, Yongjie
> Cc: KVM; Marcelo Tosatti
> Subject: Re: which branch of kvm.git should I do regular testing against?
> 
> On 05/24/2012 12:33 PM, Ren, Yongjie wrote:
> >>
> >> On 05/24/2012 12:24 PM, Ren, Yongjie wrote:
> >> > Hi Avi,
> >> > Our team spare some effort in regular nightly testing against KVM
> >> upstream.
> >> > We're using master branch now and all the test reports I sent out are
> >> based on master branch.
> >> > Which branch of kvm.git should we do regular testing against?
> >> > Your suggestion?
> >>
> >> kvm.git next.  In theory kvm.git auto-next is even better, but we
> >> sometimes forget to update it.
> >>
> > Thanks. Get it. I'll use kvm.git next.
> > As for qemu-kvm.git, master or next branch?
> 
> Unlike kvm.git, these should be pretty close.  'next' is untested,
> 'master' is tested, they are synced after testing.  I suggest 'master'.
> 
Get it. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux