Re: [PATCH 1/4] kvm-s390: add capability indicating COW support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/15/2012 03:31 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 15/05/12 14:24, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> Newer systems allow to write-protect the guest backing memory
> >> and let the fault be delivered to the host, thus allowing COW.
> >>
> >> Use a capability bit to tell qemu if that is possible.
> >>
> > 
> > Asking out of ignorance: who is doing the write protection here? The
> > guest?  If so, why is qemu involved?
>
> It is about the host doing write protection of guest/user memory (e.g. for 
> dirty pages tracking or KSM)

Ok, so why does qemu^Wuserspace need to know about it?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux