On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:02:26PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 20:04 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:54:46AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > On Sun, 13 May 2012 18:52:06 +0300 > > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > + /* Userspace may produce vectors with count greater than > > > > + * MAX_SKB_FRAGS, so we need to linearize parts of the skb > > > > + * to let the rest of data to be fit in the frags. > > > > + */ > > > Rather than complex partial code, just go through slow path for > > > requests with too many frags (or for really small requests). > > > Creating mixed skb's seems too easy to get wrong. > > > > I don't object in principle but macvtap has same code > > so seems better to stay consistent. > > > > If I remember well, code in vtap was buggy and still is. > > Jason Wang fixes are not yet in, They seem to be in net-next, or did I miss something? > so maybe wait a bit, so that we dont > add a pile of new bugs ? > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
