Il 23/04/2012 16:04, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> +/* Our own copy of __test_and_clear_bit to make sure
> + * it is done with a single instruction */
Is this for microoptimization or correctness? If the latter, it does
not ensure anything without a "lock" prefix.
Paolo
> +static inline int kvm_test_and_clear_bit(int nr, volatile u16* addr)
> +{
> + int oldbit;
> +
> + asm volatile("btr %2,%1\n\t"
> + "sbb %0,%0"
> + : "=r" (oldbit), BITOP_ADDR_CONSTRAINT(*addr) : "Ir" (nr));
> + return oldbit;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
