* Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/07/2012 02:40 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > > No objections from the x86 side. > > > > > > Is kvm.git a good tree to merge this through? > > > > Fine to me, but I haven't checked how widely it conflicts with > > existing bits: by the looks of it most of the linecount is on > > the core x86 side, while the kvm change is well concentrated. > > I don't see a problem with merging though tip.git - we're close to the > next merge window, and the guest side rarely causes conflicts. But > please don't apply the last patch yet, I want to review it more closely > (esp. with the host side). That last patch was marked "don't apply yet", so I definitely planned on another iteration that incorporates all the feedback that has been given. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
