On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 10:45:27AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 16:04 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > BTW, according to arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h unsurprisingly KVM has
> > > a signature too 'KVMKVMKVM'.
> > >
> > > > cpu->stepping = eax & 0xf;
> > > > cpu->model = (eax >> 4) & 0xf;
> > > > cpu->family = (eax >> 8) & 0xf;
> > > > @@ -29,6 +29,19 @@ void get_cpu_info_basics(struct cpudata *cpu)
> > > >
> > > > cpuid(cpu->number, 0xC0000000, &maxei, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> > > > cpu->maxei2 = maxei;
> > > > + if (ecx & 0x80000000) {
> > > > + cpuid(cpu->number, 0x40000000, &maxhv, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * KVM up to linux 3.4 reports 0 as the max hypervisor leaf,
> > > > + * where it really means 0x40000001.
> > >
> > > This is something where I definitely think you want to check the
> > > signature first.
> > In theory yes, but in practice what will this break?
>
> I've got no idea -- but what's the harm in checking?
>
> Ian.
Users can set kvm signature to anything, if they do
debugging will be a bit harder for them.
> --
> Ian Campbell
> Current Noise: Hypocrisy - Roswell 47
>
> Angels we have heard on High
> Tell us to go out and Buy.
> -- Tom Lehrer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
