On 27.04.2012, at 01:12, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 00:24 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> This is to actually enable interrupts for real, regardless of ppc64 >> and ppc32. In fact, the previous code was pretty buggy - it was >> running the handlers with interrupts disabled ;). > > They should be run with interrupts disabled.. tho both soft & hard. The kvm_resched()? No, that one should be run with interrupts enabled - hard and soft :). > You probably do want to call local_irq_disable() unconditionally anyway, > because on ppc32, that will give you the proper accounting vs. lockdep. We already do __hard_irq_disable (which maps to local_irq_disable on ppc32) when entering the guest context and when leaving the intercept handler :). So that should be fine, no? Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
