On 04/21/2012 09:10 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:33:19 -0300 > Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> It is preferable to remove all large sptes including read-only ones, the >> current behaviour, then to verify that no read->write transition can >> occur in fault paths (fault paths which are increasing in number). >> > > I think we should use separate function than spte_write_protect() for > the large case. I will introduce a function to handle large sptes when i implement the idea of making writable spte to be read-only. But, keep it in this patchset first. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
