On 04/16/2012 07:33 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2010-06-16 23:11, Chris Lalancette wrote: > > We really want to "kvm_set_irq" during the hrtimer callback, > > but that is risky because that is during interrupt context. > > Instead, offload the work to a workqueue, which is a bit safer > > and should provide most of the same functionality. > > Unfortunately, workqueues do not have fixed kthread associations (and > "kvm-pit-wq" would be too unspecific when running multiple VMs). So I > just realized that this subtly breaks the ability to run KVM guests with > RT priority (boot managers with timeouts hang as the workqueue starves). > > Before throwing some kthread_worker at this, could someone help me > recalling what was "risky" here? That the PIT IRQ may have to be > broadcast to a large number of VCPUs? (or any irq, once we make that function irq safe) > I would offer to include this > information in my changelog. ;) That, plus the need to make all the .set methods safe in that context. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
