On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:17:30PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-04-03 09:23, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > This is v2 of the RFC, fixing a memory leak in > > kvm_flush_dynamic_msi_routes and adding support for the proposed > > KVM_SIGNAL_MSI IOCTL. > > > > This series depends on "kvm: set gsi_bits and max_gsi correctly" > > (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/88906). > > > > Jan Kiszka (4): > > kvm: Refactor KVMState::max_gsi to gsi_count > > kvm: Introduce basic MSI support for in-kernel irqchips > > KVM: x86: Wire up MSI support for in-kernel irqchip > > kvm: Add support for direct MSI injections > > > > hw/apic.c | 3 + > > hw/kvm/apic.c | 33 +++++++++- > > hw/pc.c | 5 -- > > kvm-all.c | 195 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > kvm.h | 1 + > > 5 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > As we obviously agreed on the general direction regarding an MSI > injection interface, I think patches 1-3 can lose their RFC tags and are > ready for uq/master (provided there are no further review comments). > Patch 4 will be reworked once the kernel interface is finalized. > > Jan I agree. Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > -- > Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 > Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
