On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > This is v2 of the RFC, fixing a memory leak in > kvm_flush_dynamic_msi_routes and adding support for the proposed > KVM_SIGNAL_MSI IOCTL. > > This series depends on "kvm: set gsi_bits and max_gsi correctly" > (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/88906). Looks good to me. How hard would it be to add irqfd support? > Jan Kiszka (4): > kvm: Refactor KVMState::max_gsi to gsi_count > kvm: Introduce basic MSI support for in-kernel irqchips > KVM: x86: Wire up MSI support for in-kernel irqchip > kvm: Add support for direct MSI injections > > hw/apic.c | 3 + > hw/kvm/apic.c | 33 +++++++++- > hw/pc.c | 5 -- > kvm-all.c | 195 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > kvm.h | 1 + > 5 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.7.3.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
