Re: [GIT PULL] KVM updates for the 3.4 merge window

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 12:06 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > The current process is such that it takes absolutely forever for our
> > patches to get in, which is a major PITA for something in such state of
> > active development.
> 
> If the patches were posted two weeks earlier, they would have gone in.

I believe on our side they were, but Alex took a while to make up his
tree ... oh well..

> > Why don't we have Alex tree go straight to -next like I do with Kumar
> > for example ? That way I don't need to have his branch sit in my tree
> > for weeks before I push it out to Linus.
> 
> There isn't a lot of common kvm code, but what there is needs to be
> synchronized.

At least we should be able to get the important bug fixes in now, I see
that you agree in your reply to Paulus so that's good :-)

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux