On 04/02/2012 01:45 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 03:38:37PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > > On 03/30/2012 03:01 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > > I just noticed that the branch you asked Linus to pull includes none > > > of the patches that Alex sent you in the last batch, in the email with > > > subject "[PULL 00/56] ppc patch queue 2012-03-15" sent on March 15, > > > where he asked you to pull git://github.com/agraf/linux-2.6.git > > > for-upstream. > > > > > > What happened? Did they get lost in the re-signing, or is there some > > > reason you thought they shouldn't go in? > > > > That pull request was send three days before the merge window opened; > > patches are supposed to cook for a while in -next before being merged, > > especially large trees like that one. > > OK. Then there are about six commits from that string that are small, > simple fixes for bugs introduced in earlier patches, that only affect > arch/powerpc. They should go into Linus' tree as soon as possible. Sure. > How do you want to handle those? Do you want them as patches or as a > git tree, and if the latter, what do you prefer that I base them on? > Or should I send them in via Ben? Git tree against upstream please. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
