On 03/29/2012 11:22 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Split FNAME(prefetch_invalid_gpte) to check gpte independently which will
> be used in the later patch
>
>
> -static bool FNAME(prefetch_invalid_gpte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> - struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *spte,
> - pt_element_t gpte)
> +static bool FNAME(invalid_gpte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, pt_element_t gpte)
> {
> if (is_rsvd_bits_set(&vcpu->arch.mmu, gpte, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL))
> - goto no_present;
> + return true;
>
> if (!is_present_gpte(gpte))
> - goto no_present;
> + return true;
>
> if (!(gpte & PT_ACCESSED_MASK))
> - goto no_present;
> + return true;
>
> return false;
A comment (or a name change) is needed to indicate that we're not
checking for an invalid gpte, just invalid for caching in an spte.
> +}
>
>
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
