Re: performance trouble

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:13:31AM +0100, David Cure wrote:
> 		hello,
> 
> 	sorry for the delay,
> 
> Le Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:38:07AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
> > 
> > Ah, I guess the reason is that it records events only of IO thread. You
> > need to trace all vcpu threads too. Not sure trace-cmd allows more then
> > one -P option though.
> 
> 	I manage to have the physical server with only one VM with the
> slowly function and take trace during the slowly function.
> 	I upload trace in http://www.roullier.net/Report/ with :
> 	o report.txt.3.1.gz : with kernel 3.1
> 	o report.txt.3.2.gz : with kernel 3.2
> 	o report.txt.vhost-net-3.1.gz : with kernel 3.1 and vhost-net
> 	o report.txt.vhost-net.3.2.gz : with kernel 3.2 and vhost-net
> 
> 	With 3.2 + vhost-net we have 10.5s (to remember 8s with
> vmware esxi 4).
> 
Can you run the same test on Linux guest and on Windows vm with 1 cpu?
I see a lot of IPIs between vcpus.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux