Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: MMU: Split the main body of rmap_write_protect() off from others

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> -int kvm_mmu_rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 gfn,
> -			       struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> +static int __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp, int level)
>  {
> -	unsigned long *rmapp;
> -	u64 *spte;
> -	int i, write_protected = 0;
> +	u64 *spte = NULL;
> +	int write_protected = 0;
>  
> -	rmapp = __gfn_to_rmap(gfn, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL, slot);
> -	spte = rmap_next(rmapp, NULL);
> -	while (spte) {
> +	while ((spte = rmap_next(rmapp, spte))) {
>  		BUG_ON(!(*spte & PT_PRESENT_MASK));
>  		rmap_printk("rmap_write_protect: spte %p %llx\n", spte, *spte);
> -		if (is_writable_pte(*spte)) {
> +
> +		if (!is_writable_pte(*spte))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (level == PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL) {
>  			mmu_spte_update(spte, *spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK);
> -			write_protected = 1;
> +		} else {
> +			BUG_ON(!is_large_pte(*spte));
> +			drop_spte(kvm, spte);
> +			--kvm->stat.lpages;
> +			spte = NULL;
>  		}
> -		spte = rmap_next(rmapp, spte);
> +
> +		write_protected = 1;
>  	}

Something may change here: when level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL, this loop
does not handle lower level mappings after dropping large-ptes.

This may be incorrect.

	Takuya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux