On 03/08/2012 11:31 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Scott Wood <scottwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 03/02/2012 10:30 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> >>> On 02.03.2012, at 17:20, Scott Wood wrote: >>>> Again, for 85xx we should *never* sync the timebase in the kernel, >>>> hypervisor or no. >>> >>> The code says "if the kexec config option is enabled, do the sync". I'm fairly sure it's there for a reason. >> >> Sigh. I forgot about that. It's because instead of doing kexec the >> simple way, we actually physically reset the core. We really shouldn't >> do that. And we *really* shouldn't do it just because CONFIG_KEXEC is >> defined, regardless of whether we're actually booting from kexec. > > How would one rocver a core that's off in the weeds? System reset? I thought kexec was for upgrading your kernel, not recovering from crashes. > We need to at least stop it somehow before we restart into the kdump kernel. kexec > seems feasible since we have all the cores in a known state... Stop, yes. Reset, no. -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
