Re: Question on qemu-kvm 1.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Side note: I am not using vhost-net yet. I am reading from the blogs
that vhost-net gives much better performance.
I am putting another system up with vhost-net support to measure this.

Appreciate the pointers for previous question.

/a

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Al Patel <alps.oss@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> We have been using qemu/kvm 0.12.5 (unchanged with stock kernel 2.6.32).
>
> I just upgraded to qemu/kvm-1.0 and see noticable difference in packet I/O.
>
> I want to understand the enhancements in 1.0 that leads to better performance.
>
> Can you give me some pointers?
>
> Off the bat I see new event code. From observation, I see that the
> qemu-kvm process is
> taking a whole lot less CPU.
>
> Thanks
> /a
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux