Re: virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Martin Mailand <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Stefan,
>> you are right, the performance for the commits 0b9b128530b and 4fefc55ab04d
>> are both good.
>> What is the best approach to stay in the qemu-kvm.git history?
>
> I didn't know the answer so I asked on #git on freenode:

And additional information from Avi:

http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/82851

Hope this helps.

Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux