On 02/28/2012 05:55 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > __init int amd_pmu_init(void) > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c > index 5fa553b..773fee2 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ > #include <linux/ftrace_event.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > > +#include <asm/perf_event.h> > #include <asm/tlbflush.h> > #include <asm/desc.h> > #include <asm/kvm_para.h> > @@ -575,6 +576,8 @@ static void svm_hardware_disable(void *garbage) > wrmsrl(MSR_AMD64_TSC_RATIO, TSC_RATIO_DEFAULT); > > cpu_svm_disable(); > + > + x86_pmu_disable_virt(); > } > > static int svm_hardware_enable(void *garbage) > @@ -622,6 +625,8 @@ static int svm_hardware_enable(void *garbage) > > svm_init_erratum_383(); > > + x86_pmu_enable_virt(); > + > return 0; > } > These should go into x86.c. If the functions later gain meaning on Intel, we want them to be called (and nothing in the name suggests they're AMD specific). -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
