Re: [KVM paravirt issue?] Re: vsyscall=emulate regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 8:34 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/16/2012 09:39 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, this is on purpose
>
> Why?

I think the "this" refers to the PF_INSTR fault when executing at
0xffffffffff600xxx.  That's definitely intentional -- it's how
vsyscall emulation works.

I think it's unintentional that some kvm versions apparently forget to
set the PF_INSTR bit.

--Andy

>
>        -hpa
>
>
> --
> H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.
>



-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Office: (310) 553-5322
Mobile: (650) 906-0647
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux