Re: virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:36:39 +0100, Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Recently I observed performance regression regarding virtio-blk,
> especially different IO bandwidths between qemu-kvm 0.14.1 and 1.0.
> So I want to share the benchmark results, and ask you what the reason
> would be.

Interesting.  There are two obvious possibilities here.  One is that
qemu has regressed, the other is that virtio_blk has regressed; the new
qemu may negotiate new features.  Please do the following in the guest
with old and new qemus:

cat /sys/class/block/vdb/device/features

(eg, here that gives: 0010101101100000000000000000100e0).

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux