On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 03:01:26PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Yang Bai <hamo.by@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Since the different issues have been handled in the >> > internal of kvm__init, it can only return NULL if error >> > happened. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Yang Bai <hamo.by@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Sorry, I don't understand what this patch is attempting to fix? Why do >> you think it's better to drop the explicit error codes and always >> return NULL upon error? >> Ok. Since the different issues have been handled in the internal of this function and the caller does not care about the real error reasons. So just return NULL if error will simplify the error handle of the caller. > > Yeah, I somehow don't get it as well. > > Cyrill -- """ Keep It Simple,Stupid. """ Chinese Name: 白杨 Nick Name: Hamo Homepage: http://hamobai.com/ GPG KEY ID: 0xA4691A33 Key fingerprint = 09D5 2D78 8E2B 0995 CF8E 4331 33C4 3D24 A469 1A33 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
