On 02/07/2012 10:41 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 07.02.2012 16:21, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:BTW, I would like to change /i440fx to /devices/i440fx, so that we will have clean namespaces: /block ... /chardev ... /clocks ... /devices /peripheral ... # named devices created with -device /peripheral-anon /child[...] # unnamed devices created with -device /default /child[...] # created with qdev_createI don't like that, I prefer /i440fx over /devices/i440fx. I don't mind the other root-level nodes though.
Let's try Paolo's cleanup for now. I am worried about proliferation of things in the root hierarchy and the nice advantage of having /devices is that we can work towards making our build infrastructure roughly match our hierarchy.
Since 1.1 is unstable for QOM, we can always change it later.
For PC-style machines I'd expect board-level stuff like the CPUs to appear directly under /. That would roughly correspond to the OpenFirmware device tree then.
I think devices trees are a bad example that should not be emulated. Regards, Anthony Liguori -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
