Am 30.01.2012 11:39, schrieb Avi Kivity: > On 01/27/2012 09:23 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> Currently, all task switches check privileges against the DPL of the >> TSS. This is only correct for jmp/call to a TSS. If a task gate is used, >> the DPL of this take gate is used for the check instead. Exceptions, >> external interrupts and iret shouldn't perform any check. >> >> >> @@ -2372,12 +2389,32 @@ static int emulator_do_task_switch(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, >> >> /* FIXME: check that next_tss_desc is tss */ >> >> - if (reason != TASK_SWITCH_IRET) { >> - if ((tss_selector & 3) > next_tss_desc.dpl || >> - ops->cpl(ctxt) > next_tss_desc.dpl) >> - return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0); >> + /* >> + * Check privileges. The three cases are task switch caused by... >> + * >> + * 1. Software interrupt: Check against DPL of the task gate >> + * 2. Exception/IRQ/iret: No check is performed >> + * 3. jmp/call: Check agains DPL of the TSS >> + */ >> + dpl = -1; >> + if (reason == TASK_SWITCH_GATE) { >> + if (idt_index != -1) { >> + struct kvm_desc_struct task_gate_desc; >> + >> + ret = read_interrupt_descriptor(ctxt, idt_index, >> + &task_gate_desc); >> + if (ret != X86EMUL_CONTINUE) >> + return ret; >> + >> + dpl = task_gate_desc.dpl; >> + } >> + } else if (reason != TASK_SWITCH_IRET) { >> + dpl = next_tss_desc.dpl; >> } >> >> + if (dpl != -1 && ((tss_selector & 3) > dpl || ops->cpl(ctxt) > dpl)) >> + return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0); > > Should be #GP(selector), no? This line is just moved code, but without looking it up I would expect the selector, yes. Would be an independent bug. I can add a patch to the series if you like. > The TASK-GATE: branch of the CALL instruction documentation lists many > other conditions which we don't check, so I'll accept this, otherwise > we'll never make any progress. Hm, I didn't really look at call, just iret and exceptions. Seems there are many test cases left to write. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html