On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:24:56 +0200 Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/23/2012 12:42 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: > > The last one is an RFC patch: > > > > I think it is better to refactor the rmap things, if needed, before > > other architectures than x86 starts large pages support. > > > > Not commenting about the meat of the patches (not sufficiently recovered > yet), but other architectures may not want the write_count stuff at all, > or even kvm_memory_slot::rmap. It may make sense to move those members > into a new kvm_memory_slot::arch arch-specific substructure. It seems nice. We can also put double buffering related things into that arch structure! I will look again and take the new approach. Takuya -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
