Re: qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:46:39PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> do we need some KVM knob comparable to qemu-kvm's -kvm-shadow-memory in
> upstream?
> 
> If yes: The underlying IOCTL is x86-only. Are other archs interested in
> this long-term as well, ie. should the control become arch-independent?
> 
> Jan

Last time i asked about removal, Avi wished for it to remain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux