Re: [Qemu-devel] State of KVM bits in linux-headers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/11/2012 01:32 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:

On 11.01.2012, at 20:16, Jan Kiszka wrote:

Hi,

I'm a bit unhappy about the current state of our supposed to be
automatically sync'ed linux-headers directory in qemu. It has been
updated several times against undefined kernel trees, means against
neither a released version nor kvm.git. Now, if I run an update against
kvm.git + some local change, I get a churn of removals. Same will happen
when that local change ever goes upstream before the other stuff got
finally committed.

Yes, call me even more unhappy about it :(.

May I suggest the following:

1) Have the header syncing script take a commit hash that's stored in git. Make script ensure that this has is in Linus' tree.

2) Maintain a patch on top of Linus' tree in qemu.git that the script would apply before actually syncing header files.

That let's us track how we're differing from upstream in a more reliable fashion.

Alex, it looks to me like this is mostly PPC stuff. Can you comment on
the origin and workflow? E.g. KVM_CAP_SW_TLB: This has been added half a
year ago but is not in any Linux release around. Fishy...

Ok, here's my workflow:

   * KVM: receive patches on the ML
   * KVM: wait for reviews, review myself
   * KVM: send out a pull request
   -- this is the point in time where I assume the ABI can be considered stable --
   * QEMU: run update on the headers, because in a perfect world things should hit kvm.git any day
   * KVM: pull request gets reviews causing not-pulls or abi changes and lots of churn because i need forever to pullreq again ;)

I guess you see the problem. Hence I haven't pushed any kernel header updates since I realized how badly broken that process was. However even the stuff that's in qemu.git now hasn't managed to get upstream yet.

I don't think it's a broken process. I think you made a reasonable set of assumptions. I think it was just an exceptional circumstance.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux