> -----Original Message----- > From: Avi Kivity [mailto:avi@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:08 AM > To: Konstantin Ryabitsev > Cc: Ren, Yongjie; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ftpadmin > Subject: Re: where should I report kvm kernel bug? > > On 01/03/2012 06:28 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 12:10 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > > > I'm surprised bugzilla.kernel.org isn't responding. Copying > > > ftpadmin@xxxxxxxxxx for ETA (though that address isn't responding, either). > > > > Hi, Avi and Ren: > > > > Unfortunately, we don't currently have an ETA for bringing up > > bugzilla.kernel.org. We are still awaiting some hardware deliveries > > before we can recover that service. > > The KVM developers suggest a virtual machine in the meantime? > > > I suggest you ask KVM developers > > where they would prefer to have the bug reported. > > Ren, please use the qemu bug tracker temporarily, just make sure to mark > it as a kernel bug. > Thanks, Avi and Konstantin. I'll use qemu bugzilla to track kvm bug temporarily. > > Sorry for lack of responses -- the holidays always make it more > > difficult to respond in time. > > > > Thanks. > > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����o�^n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�
