Re: [PATCH 4/5] KVM: PPC: Book3s HV: Implement get_dirty_log using hardware changed bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(2011/12/26 8:35), Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:23:30PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:

So if I read things correctly, this is the only case you're setting
pages as dirty. What if you have the following:

   guest adds HTAB entry x
   guest writes to page mapped by x
   guest removes HTAB entry x
   host fetches dirty log

In that case the dirtiness is preserved in the setting of the
KVMPPC_RMAP_CHANGED bit in the rmap entry.  kvm_test_clear_dirty()
returns 1 if that bit is set (and clears it).  Using the rmap entry
for this is convenient because (a) we also use it for saving the
referenced bit when a HTAB entry is removed, and we can transfer both
R and C over in one operation; (b) we need to be able to save away the
C bit in real mode, and we already need to get the real-mode address
of the rmap entry -- if we wanted to save it in a dirty bitmap we'd
have to do an extra translation to get the real-mode address of the
dirty bitmap word; (c) to avoid SMP races, if we were asynchronously
setting bits in the dirty bitmap we'd have to do the double-buffering
thing that x86 does, which seems more complicated than using the rmap
entry (which we already have a lock bit for).

From my x86 dirty logging experience I have some concern about your code:
your code looks slow even when there is no/few dirty pages in the slot.

+	for (i = 0; i < memslot->npages; ++i) {
+		if (kvm_test_clear_dirty(kvm, rmapp))
+			__set_bit_le(i, map);
+		++rmapp;
+	}

The check is being done for each page and this can be very expensive because
the number of pages is not small.

	When we scan the dirty_bitmap 64 pages are checked at once and
	the problem is not so significant.

Though I do not know well what kvm-ppc's dirty logging is aiming at, I guess
reporting cleanliness without noticeable delay to the user-space is important.

	E.g. for VGA most of the cases are clean.  For live migration, the
	chance of seeing complete clean slot is small but almost all cases
	are sparse.


PS: Always CC kvm@vger for stuff that other might want to review
(basically all patches)

(Though I sometimes check kvm-ppc on the archives,)

GET_DIRTY_LOG thing will be welcome.

	Takuya


So why do we have a separate kvm-ppc list then? :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux