Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: PPC: align vcpu_kick with x86

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 13:56 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:

> > Hmm, unless smp_send_reschedule must be called with preemption disabled
> > (doesn't seem like an obvious requirement, even if callers commonly have
> > a reason to do so, and the only documentation of it I see is on the ia64
> > implementation), that seems like a bug in the MPIC IPI implementation.
> > 
> > It wouldn't be an issue (and would make the MPIC driver slightly faster,
> > too) if the MPIC driver were to use the magic CPU region instead of
> > manually indexing the non-magic array of per-CPU regions.  Maybe it
> > doesn't work on all hardware the driver supports?

Right, the magic per-cpu region doesn't work on all HW.

> I'd say that's a question I'll redirect to Ben :).
> 
> > Not that it matters much here -- we want this patch anyway, because we
> > want to check that it's not the current CPU.
> 
> Yeah. Well - eventually we want the exact same vcpu_kick function across architectures.
> But this is a good step in the right direction.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux